Apple (AAPL, Fortune 500) alleged that several Samsung
products infringe on its patents. Apple originally filed this lawsuit
against Samsung in 2011, and it's just one of dozens of ongoing patent
lawsuits currently being waged between the tech titans across the globe.
In the latest case, the International Trade Comission
ruled in favor of Apple. The comission said Samsung products infringed
on two Apple patents, one for touchscreen multitouch and another related
to headset plug detection. The court ruled Samsung did not infringe on
four other patents listed in Apple
The ITC banned Samsung for importing or selling some
devices that infringe on the Apple patents. While the devices Apple
mentioned in the case are older Samsung products -- like the Galaxy Tab 7
tablet and the Continuum smartphone -- the same technology.
But Samsung has the chance to release the software
updates to work around the infrigement -- for example, customers would
still use multitouch the same wau the always did, but Samsung would
change how that worked fromt a technical perspective.
Tech companies like to bring their cases before the ITC
because it's generally easier get that court to ban the sale of
patent-violating products, when compared with the traditional patent
court system.
U.S import bans are obviously serious concerns from
foreign companies like South Korea-based Samsung. But they're just as
problematic for those headquartered in America because most tech
products -- including Apple's -- are assembled overseas and must be
imported.
Even if Samsung weren't able to figure out a workaround,
there's a chance the ITC's import ban won't stick. Earlier this summer
the ITC ruled on Samsung;s own 2011 filing against Apple -- and it ended
with the agency issuing an import ban on Apple products. But the ITC is
required by law to send such "exclusion orders" to the president for a
60-day review. In an extremely rare move, President Obama vetoed that
ITC order just befoer the review period was up.
This case is one of four Apple-Samsung patent battles
currently playing out in U.S. courts, and dozens more are being tried
abroad. Billions of dollars are on the line, and the companies are
warring to take each other's products off the shelve.
The good news for consumers is that the trial proceedings
in such disputes typically take so long that the products in question
are often long obsolete by the time a judge rules.
No comments:
Confused? Feel free to ask
Your feedback is always appreciated. We will try to reply to your queries as soon as time allows